Reception cannot cover the hours
Enquiries arrive after a crash, after an arrest, after a letter lands on a Saturday. Your front desk works business hours. The gap between those two facts is where your pipeline leaks.
Ashleigh answers your inbound calls, qualifies the matter and books the intake. Bridget works the enquiries that never became files. Both speak in your firm’s name, and both say they are AI before they say anything else.
Good afternoon, you have reached Harrow & Bell. I am Ashleigh, an AI assistant for the firm. I can take your details and get you booked with a solicitor. May I ask what the call is about?
I was rear-ended on the Gateway about three weeks ago. I still cannot get back to work.
I am sorry, that sounds like a difficult few weeks. So I get you to the right person, was a police report made at the scene?
Yes, and I have the other driver’s details.
That helps. I have Thursday at 10:40 or Friday at 2 with Priya, who runs our motor accident matters. Which suits you better?
Legal enquiries are won on response speed. The person who has just been injured, charged or served is ringing more than one number, and they instruct whoever picks up and sounds competent.
Enquiries arrive after a crash, after an arrest, after a letter lands on a Saturday. Your front desk works business hours. The gap between those two facts is where your pipeline leaks.
A distressed caller who reaches a recorded message rarely leaves one and almost never rings back. They dial the next firm on the search page while your message is still playing.
Most firms hold hundreds of past enquiries that never became files. Nobody has the hours to call them back, so they sit in the system ageing quietly.
They are deliberately separate. Keeping inbound and outbound apart means a person Bridget called is never answered later by an agent with no memory of them, and every file can be traced to the campaign that produced it.
Answers every call to your firm, day or night. Identifies the matter type, runs your intake questions, flags anything time-critical, and books the caller straight into the right person’s calendar.
Works the list you already own. Calls past enquirers who never became files, checks whether the matter was ever resolved, requalifies the ones still live, and books them back into intake.
These are not settings a client can switch off. They are written into every agent we build, because a voice agent on a law firm’s number carries the firm’s professional obligations, not ours.
If you want an agent that pretends to be a person, we are the wrong supplier.
Every agent is built against your matter types, your intake questions and the thresholds that apply in your state. Here is the whole process.
One call. We map your matter types, the questions reception already asks, who each type routes to, and what counts as urgent.
We configure the agent and send you recordings of it handling your scenarios. You mark up the wording until it sounds like your firm.
Divert after hours, on busy, or on every call. Your number stays yours. Nothing about your existing phone system has to change.
Every call arrives as a transcript and a structured summary. Tell us what she got wrong and the script is updated that week.
We publish the full stack, name every third party that touches a call, and state plainly where each one stores data. Law firms ask these questions before anything else, so we answer them before you ask.
$1,200 per month, plus GST
One agent, one firm, as many matter types as you run. The setup fee covers the intake workshop, the build and the review rounds until you sign off on how she sounds.
Setup fee plus a fee per file opened
Calls that go nowhere cost you nothing. We are paid when the firm actually opens a file from the campaign, which keeps the incentive on qualification rather than call volume.
Yes, and that is deliberate.
She identifies herself as an AI assistant within the first ten seconds of every call, before taking any details. If a caller asks directly, she confirms it. An agent that implies it is human exposes your firm to a misleading conduct problem, and it is the first thing a client complains about afterwards.
The script stops and the call goes to a person.
Distress, a direct legal question, or anything time-critical triggers an immediate handover rather than another qualifying question. Outside business hours she takes the details, flags the call as urgent and makes sure it is at the top of the queue in the morning.
No. Not an opinion on merit, not a view on what a matter is worth, not a time limit applied to a caller’s specific facts.
She collects information and books appointments. Anything that would amount to advice is routed to a solicitor, which is the only safe design for a tool operating on a law firm’s number.
Days rather than months. The workshop is one call, and the first build usually comes back to you within the week.
What sets the timeline is your review. Most firms want two or three passes on wording before they are happy to put her on the line, and we would rather you took them.
Yes, with configuration work first.
Our tested build is Queensland. Deploying into another state means rebuilding the urgency thresholds and routing against that jurisdiction’s rules rather than reusing the Queensland ones. We will tell you on the first call whether your state adds time to the build.
The language model runs on Anthropic Claude hosted in AWS Sydney, so the reasoning layer stays onshore.
Speech and workflow components involve third parties, some of which process outside Australia. We name each one and state its position on the security page rather than making a blanket claim we cannot stand behind.
Send us your firm name and what you want handled. We configure an agent on your matter types and call you back from it, so you are judging the real thing rather than a recording we chose.